Compass Florida is facing a proposed class action lawsuit in Palm Beach County over a $475 transaction fee that two Florida homebuyers allege was improperly added to their purchase contract and collected at closing.

The lawsuit, filed June 23 by Jeff and Milissa Efron, accuses Compass Florida of unfair and deceptive business practices tied to what the complaint describes as an undisclosed flat fee charged to buyer clients. The Efrons, who bought a North Palm Beach property in August 2024 using a Compass agent, allege they were told their buyer agent would be paid through the commission paid by the seller, but later paid Compass a $475 “flat transaction commission” at closing.

The complaint alleges that Compass inserted the fee into an “additional terms” section of a Florida Realtors and Florida Bar-approved residential purchase contract. The plaintiffs argue that the modification was not an approved contract change and amounted to the unauthorized practice of law by a non-lawyer.

The suit brings claims under the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. It seeks class-action status on behalf of Florida buyers who paid a similar Compass transaction fee during the four years before the complaint was filed, along with damages, attorney fees, injunctive relief and the return of allegedly improper fees.

The complaint alleges those buyers were charged “an illegitimate, deceptive and unfair flat fee or transaction fee” that was disclosed through a modification to a Florida Realtors and Florida Bar-approved purchase contract and then collected at closing.

In a statement to Inman, Compass defended the use of transaction fees as common across the industry.

“This has been standard practice in major markets, including Chicago, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C., for years, and is done by many other brands in the industry,” a Compass spokesperson said.

The lawsuit comes amid heightened scrutiny over agent compensation and disclosure across the brokerage industry. In its 2025 annual report, Compass said it generates revenue from its owned-brokerage business through its share of agents’ gross sales commissions and “certain other fees, such as flat transaction commission fees.” The Florida lawsuit, however, focuses on a transaction that closed in August 2024, before Compass reportedly expanded transaction fees more broadly this year.

Email AJ LaTrace

If you’re looking to buy a home or refinance your current mortgage, understanding today’s mortgage rates is crucial, and as of June 3, 2026, the numbers are showing a slight upward tick. The average 30-year fixed-rate purchase loan has climbed to 6.37%, according to Zillow’s latest data. This small but significant shift means borrowing a bit more is costing a bit more, and it’s happening across the board for most loan types.

What’s really driving these changes, and what does it mean for your dream of homeownership or saving money on your existing loan? Let’s dive into the details.

Today’s Mortgage Rates, June 3: Rates Rise Again, Homebuyers Face Higher Costs

Today’s Mortgage Rate Snapshot (June 3, 2026)

Here’s a breakdown of the average mortgage rates as of this morning, based on Zillow’s data:

Loan Type	Average Rate
30-year fixed	6.37%
20-year fixed	6.17%
15-year fixed	5.78%
5/1 ARM	6.54%
7/1 ARM	6.29%
30-year VA	5.84%
15-year VA	5.47%
5/1 VA	5.49%

As you can see, the 30-year fixed rate for purchases went up by 9 basis points compared to yesterday. The 15-year fixed also saw a slight increase of 3 basis points, now sitting at 5.78%. For those considering an Adjustable-Rate Mortgage (ARM), the 5/1 ARM is up by a more noticeable 19 basis points to 6.54%. These aren’t massive jumps, but they are movements in a clear direction – up.

Why Are Rates Moving Today? It’s a Mix of Things.

It’s easy to get caught up in just the number for today’s mortgage rate, but understanding why it’s at that level is key. The mortgage market doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It’s deeply connected to the broader economy, both here at home and around the world.

Right now, the main story is that borrowing costs are sticking around at higher levels than we might have hoped for, even with the Federal Reserve making a few rate cuts late last year. Two big forces are at play: domestic economic pressures and some unexpected global events.

Spiking Inflation: The Economic Pinch

The biggest culprit behind these stubborn rates is a recent jump in inflation. You’ve probably seen it at the gas pump or the grocery store – prices are going up. The Federal Reserve pays close attention to a measure called the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation rate, which is their preferred way to track how prices are changing for everyday goods and services. This rate has climbed to 3.8% year-over-year as of April.

When inflation is hot like this, lenders have to adjust their pricing. They need to ensure that the money they lend out today will still have good buying power in the future. So, they raise mortgage rates to protect their returns against the rising cost of everything else. It’s a way for them to keep up.

The Federal Reserve’s Stance: On Hold (For Now)

Because of this elevated inflation, the Federal Reserve has put a pause on their benchmark interest rate through the first half of this year. This means they aren’t looking to lower borrowing costs in the immediate future. In fact, many people in the financial world have stopped expecting any rate cuts anytime soon. Some analysts are even talking about the possibility of the Fed raising rates by the end of the year to try and cool down the economy and bring inflation back under control. This shift in expectations has a direct impact on mortgage rates.

The Chain Reaction: How Yields, Inflation, and Global Events Connect

To really grasp why mortgage rates are where they are, we need to look at a chain reaction. It’s a bit like dominoes falling:

• Global Events (The War in Iran): A significant global event, like the war in Iran that started earlier this spring, has caused a major shock to energy prices. Think about it: when there’s conflict in a major oil-producing region, global crude oil prices tend to shoot up. We’ve seen prices surpass $90 a barrel. This directly increases the cost of manufacturing, transporting goods, and, of course, filling up your car.
• Higher Oil & Gas Prices: As crude oil gets more expensive, so does everything that relies on it. This includes transportation costs for businesses and the price of gasoline for consumers.
• Stubborn Inflation: When energy prices are high, it ripples through the economy. Businesses have to pay more to produce and deliver their goods, and they often pass those costs on to consumers. This is a major driver of that persistent inflation we’re seeing.
• Rising 10-Year Treasury Yields: Now, this is a critical link. Mortgage rates don’t directly follow the Federal Reserve’s short-term rates. Instead, they are much more closely tied to the yields on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond. Because the energy shock and the resulting inflation fears are making people worry about the value of money decreasing, investors who buy these bonds want to be compensated more for that risk. They demand higher yields. As the 10-year Treasury yield goes up, mortgage rates almost always follow suit. We’ve seen this yield climb toward a six-month high recently.
• Higher Mortgage Rates: And that brings us back to where we started. When the cost of borrowing for the government (the Treasury yield) goes up, the cost of borrowing for homebuyers and homeowners looking to refinance also goes up.

Market Dynamics: Amplifying the Moves

There’s another layer to this, happening in the secondary market where mortgages are bought and sold. It’s called “market convexity hedging.” Essentially, a lot of financial institutions hold mortgage-backed securities (MBS) that have interest rates of 5% or higher. When interest rates start to climb, these investments can become less valuable. To protect themselves from big losses, these institutions have to make moves that can, ironically, push mortgage rates even higher. It’s a bit of a feedback loop that can make rates more volatile.

What Does This Mean for You?

So, what’s the takeaway from all this? Projections from major housing organizations like Fannie Mae and the Mortgage Bankers Association suggest that we’re likely in a “higher-for-longer” environment for mortgage rates. This means they expect rates to stay elevated for a while, possibly averaging around 6.3% to 6.5% for the rest of the year.

If you’re a homebuyer: This means the cost of financing your purchase will remain higher than in recent years. It might influence how much house you can afford or how aggressively you need to save for a down payment. It’s more important than ever to shop around for the best rate from different lenders, as even small differences can add up significantly over the life of a loan. Getting pre-approved can also give you a clearer picture of your borrowing power and help you lock in a rate when you find the right home.

If you’re looking to refinance: If you have a mortgage with a rate significantly higher than today’s offerings, refinancing could still be a good option to lower your monthly payments. However, with rates hovering in the mid-6% range, the math for refinancing might be tighter than it was when rates were in the 3% or 4% range. You’ll need to carefully calculate if the savings outweigh the closing costs involved.

My personal take? While these numbers might seem a bit discouraging compared to the super-low rates of the recent past, they are not historically high. We’ve seen mortgage rates in the 6% range and higher many times before. The key is to stay informed, understand your financial situation, and make the decision that’s right for you at this moment. Don’t let a small upward tick today make you panic. Instead, use this information to make a smart, strategic move.

The latest technological revolution has upended the San Francisco Bay Area’s housing market, where AI pioneers flush with cash are offering massive down payments to lock down increasingly scarce premium properties.

To track this phenomenon, the Realtor.com® economic research team studied down payment trends from 2020 to 2025, comparing the Bay Area to other major economic and innovation hubs: Miami, New York City, and Austin, TX.

The analysis outlined in a new report reveals that while 2023’s high mortgage rates spurred luxury home buyers across all four markets to put more money down in a bid to reduce their loan size, the Bay Area was the only metro where down payments remained inflated even as borrowing costs began to ease. 

Based on the timing, Realtor.com economist Jiayi Xu attributes this stark divergence to the local AI boom and the resulting liquidity events, which have allowed tech industry professionals to convert stock into cash and inject it directly into home purchases.

Before 2023, the typical luxury down payment in the Bay Area stood at 28.4%. Xu notes that as mortgage rates ebbed, down payment shares naturally shrank back toward baseline levels in Miami, New York City, and Austin. The Bay Area should have expected to see a similar dynamic, yet it bucked the trend: Its median down payment remained elevated at 35% last year.

The $200K AI premium

Xu suggests that the resulting 6.6 percentage-point premium aligns with the acceleration of AI investment—through employee tender offers, secondary market transactions, and record-breaking company valuations—that was largely absent from Miami, Austin, and New York City.

In practical terms, that gap means that a buyer purchasing a $3 million property in the Bay Area in 2025 had to drop an additional $198,000 upfront.  

This research closely mirrors reality on the ground, where the AI boom has sparked a real estate frenzy in the Bay Area.

Alexander Kalla, a San Francisco Bay Area–based real estate agent, tells Realtor.com he is currently working with a buyer looking to purchase a $3 million home on the Peninsula, which encompasses the affluent tech-centric communities south of San Francisco.

“They put down well above the conventional 20%, closer to 40%, sourced entirely from equity tied to their employer in the AI sector,” he says. “Without that posture, they would have been outbid. The home had multiple offers, and the seller selected theirs specifically because the larger down payment removed financing risk and shortened the path to close.”

According to the agent, the buyer’s decision to deploy that employee stock equity instead of holding it added roughly $200,000 to the cash brought to the table relative to a conventional 20% buyer—right in line with the typical Bay Area buyer identified by the Realtor.com analysis.

The Bay Area’s new 40% baseline

In fact, Kalla says inflated down payments in the area’s luxury tier have become a mainstay over the past 18 months. In the $5 million-plus segment on the Peninsula, 40% to 55% down payments are now the baseline expectation, not an outlier.

“Conventional 20% leverage at that price point is almost nonexistent in my experience,” he points out.

The agent explains that one of the major reasons buyers are willing to part with so much cash upfront is to ease their way to the closing table by winning over sellers in the region’s cutthroat environment.

“At these price points, sellers will accept materially less money in exchange for a cleaner offer,” says Kalla. “A 50% down buyer with no financing contingency is worth more to a seller than a 20% down buyer at the same headline price.”

Another major consideration is what Kalla calls “interest rate desensitivity,” explaining that a 40% down payment buys functional immunity from rate volatility. In this scenario, buyers no longer have to worry as much about monthly mortgage payments, which is significant for people whose compensation is centered on unconventional employee stock awards.

In addition, there are tax implications to consider. Mortgage interest deduction caps at $750,000 of principal, Kalla notes, are essentially irrelevant on a $10 million home.

“These buyers are equity-rich. Deploying liquidity rather than borrowing is the cleaner answer,” says the agent.

Beyond the financial strategy, Kalla says an outsized down payment reflects Bay Area buyers’ deep commitment to the region.

“They’re making 15- to 30-year decisions tied to schools, family, and roots,” he says. “The down payment reflects how permanently they intend to occupy the home.”

Kalla confirms that the major driver behind all these trends is employee stock cash-outs. OpenAI alone created liquidity for thousands of employees without even going public, with other major industry players like Anthropic, Stripe, and Databricks taking the same path.

“That capital doesn’t sit in money market accounts. It looks for hard assets, and Peninsula real estate is the default destination,” contends the agent.

AI wealth’s chain reaction

Notably, the impact of AI equity is felt well beyond the Bay Area’s premium housing sector. The Realtor.com report indicates that a growing share of mortgages in the $750,000 to $1.5 million segment carried down payments exceeding 30% in 2024–25—even as the median remained unchanged at 20%.

According to Xu, two major factors are behind this trend. The first is a direct AI wealth effect, where young professionals enter this price range with more cash than typical buyers.

The second is a displacement effect: Buyers originally looking to purchase a home in the $1.5 million to $3 million range are being crowded out by competitors with more AI equity, forcing them to move down to the midtier market with extra cash to spend on a down payment.

Kallas calls this a “chain reaction” dynamic.

“An AI-equity buyer purchasing at $5 million frees a $2.5 million home, which sells to a midcareer tech buyer, which frees a $1.5 million starter,” says the agent. “Inventory moves faster at every tier because the top is pulling.”

Helping real estate clients make a stress-free transition to their new home often involves recommending a company that can help them with their move. But providing that service can quickly become complicated due to all the moving pieces it involves.

To simplify things, realtors may refer clients to a moving broker who can streamline the moving process by bringing all of the pieces together in one place. These brokers connect consumers with packers, movers, and storage companies while providing the expertise needed to make sure all the unique factors involved in a move are considered and addressed.

For realtors who choose to help their clients in this way, it’s important to make sure the recommended broker is properly licensed and committed to carrying out all requirements defined by the law. Recommending anything less can result in problems that are costly to a client and, consequently, damaging to your reputation.

What is a licensed broker?

US law requires moving brokers to be officially registered with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), an agency of the US Department of Transportation that monitors and ensures compliance with motor carrier safety regulations. Licensed brokers receive a registration number from the FMCSA that must be displayed on every piece of advertising they publish, including their website, online advertisements, and printed materials.

Brokers also must maintain a surety bond or trust fund of $75,000. This requirement ensures that the moving companies that a broker works with will be paid if the broker defaults on their obligation.

Brokers are also required to be transparent about their role in the moving process. They must explain on their websites and other advertising that they are a broker, not a moving company that will be physically moving goods.

Real estate professionals and consumers can determine whether a broker is registered with the FMCSA by visiting www.protectyourmove.gov or calling the FMCSA at (202) 366-9805 for licensing information.

What is a broker required to provide?

Federal law requires brokers to provide consumers with two education documents before booking a move. The first is “Your Rights and Responsibilities When You Move,” which is an FMCSA booklet that explains the rights and responsibilities of consumers and movers.

The FMCSA booklet lists five things in addition to the booklet that a broker should provide to every consumer before a move:

• A written estimate of all costs.
• Information about the mover’s arbitration program.
• A written notice about access to the mover’s tariff, which is a legally binding document that outlines standard rates, fees, and service commitments.
• Information on the process for handling claims.
• The “Ready to Move” brochure published by the FMCSA.

The “Ready to Move” brochure, the second document brokers are required to provide, gives consumers a checklist of steps to take before the move, on moving day, and on the day the moving company delivers the shipment to the new location. It also lists common problems movers may encounter and how to pursue dispute settlement or arbitration if they arise.

How do brokers help ensure a safe move?

In addition to streamlining the moving process, moving brokers can also help ensure common moving pitfalls are avoided. Most importantly, they help ensure that the company handling the actual physical move is vetted and licensed by the FMCSA to provide moving services.

Moving brokers can also help ensure consumers get a reliable written estimate of moving costs. The FMCSA requires movers to provide written estimates for the services they provide, which must include all charges and be signed by the mover and the consumer.

Without getting a solid estimate in advance, which usually involves a physical inspection of the home and its contents, consumers can be surprised on moving day by elevated costs charged due to large household goods, difficult logistics, or other factors. Unfortunately, it’s common in the moving industry for dishonest moving companies to draw consumers in with low estimates, then to tack on additional fees on moving day that significantly elevate costs. Brokers can help consumers avoid companies that operate that way.

Moving is never easy, but connecting with a licensed and experienced broker can ensure it isn’t more difficult than it needs to be. Brokers not only bring valuable experience to the equation but also give consumers access to a larger pool of potential moving companies. Brokers help your client get the right mover — one that can effectively handle their unique requirements — so they don’t need to deal with unwelcome surprises on moving day.

Your paycheck may be growing, but “inflation contagion” is eating up those gains—and then some.

Despite some frustrating macro headlines, there are real silver linings in the housing market worth paying attention to.

Mortgage rates are holding steady, sellers are recalibrating their expectations, rents keep softening, and new research puts a hard number on what buyers can save in operating costs by choosing a new-construction home.

Inflation is running hot—but markets saw it coming

The latest economic data confirmed what many economists anticipated: Inflation is running hot in the wake of Middle East tensions, and the pressure isn’t confined to energy prices.

Realtor.com® senior economist Jake Krimmel described the phenomenon as “inflation contagion”—a ripple effect that has spread across categories and more than wiped out nominal wage gains, pushing real earnings down both month over month and year over year.

The silver lining here is that this outcome was widely expected, which is partly why mortgage rates barely flinched in response. Rates actually dipped 1 basis point lower this week. (It’s worth noting that the weekly rate sample skewed toward pre-CPI days, so the full market reaction may still be unfolding.)

Looking ahead, the trajectory of rates will continue to track geopolitical developments. Any escalation in the Middle East could push rates higher, while progress toward a broader resolution could bring them down further.

Ready for something new?

Search new construction

Existing-home sales hold steady

The National Association of Realtors® April existing-home sales estimate showed the market holding its ground.

Sales edged up 0.2% for the month, matching last year’s pace of 4.02 million—and that gain came on top of an upward revision to March’s figures.

Median home prices continued to rise, climbing just under 1% from a year ago to $417,700. Price growth was strongest in the Northeast and Midwest, with a mild decline in the South.

These regional patterns align closely with the Realtor.com analysis of the supply gap: Housing supply remains an acute constraint in the Northeast and Midwest, while the South and West have more breathing room.

Sellers are getting more realistic

The Realtor.com weekly housing data showed little change in broader trends, but one signal stood out: Listing prices continue to soften.

Realtor.com senior economic research analyst Hannah Jones highlighted this as evidence that sellers are adjusting their expectations upfront rather than testing the market high and reducing later.

That shift is creating a more buyer-friendly environment heading into spring.

Rent relief continues

For those not yet ready to buy, the rental market is offering continued relief.

The Realtor.com April Rent Report marks 33 consecutive months of year-over-year rent declines, adding up to roughly 5% in cumulative national relief. The softening is widespread across unit sizes and geographies.

Realtor.com economist Jiayi Xu found encouraging signs that the trend could continue: While completions and units under construction are easing off COVID-19 pandemic-era highs, multifamily housing starts picked up in the first quarter, showing resilience in the construction pipeline.

At the current pace, the rental housing stock is expected to grow by just under 1% nationally over the next year, with the strongest supply growth in the Northeast.

Luxury market cools, but pockets of growth emerge

The Realtor.com April Luxury Report found that high-end home prices continue to soften. Prices in the top 10% of the market fell 1.9% from April 2025, and $1 million listings now comprise 13.5% of all listings, down from 14.1% the prior year.

That said, the story isn’t uniform. Realtor.com senior economist Anthony Smith identified emerging luxury markets—smaller areas where the number of million-dollar listings is actively growing—suggesting the high-end tier is scaling in new places even as it cools in established ones.

New construction can save you $25K in operating costs

One of the more striking findings this week comes from a new Total Cost of Ownership report by Realtor.com senior economist Joel Berner: On average, buying a new home rather than an existing one saves roughly $25,000 in energy and replacement costs over the first 10 years of ownership.

The savings vary significantly by state. New England sees the biggest operating cost advantages from new construction, driven largely by the region’s heavy energy usage. Southern states see more modest savings.

The trade-off, however, runs in the opposite direction: New construction carries a higher price premium in the Northeast and a smaller one—sometimes even a discount—in the South. So new-home buyers in the Northeast generally pay more upfront but recoup more over time, while Southern buyers see smaller premiums alongside smaller long-term savings.

In 16 of the top 300 metropolitan areas, the 10-year operating cost savings from buying new construction fully cover the upfront pricing gap between new and existing homes—making the total-cost math particularly compelling in those markets.

For anyone currently shopping for a home, it’s worth factoring total cost of ownership into the calculus, not just the listing price.

Get real estate news in your inbox

Sign up now

As the property tax revolt reaches a fever pitch across the country, a new analysis points to an often overlooked person bearing the brunt of rising tax burdens: homebuyers.

The national push to lower property taxes has long centered on a familiar figure: longtime homeowners whose tax bills have climbed alongside home values, sometimes rivaling what they once paid for the mortgage itself. 

But in 11 cities, new buyers face a property tax bill that is at least double what existing owners of comparable homes pay, based on an analysis conducted by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence.

“When house prices shoot up in cities with assessment limits, this can create a huge wedge between the property tax bills of recent homebuyers versus longtime homeowners,” explains Jake Krimmel, senior economist at Realtor.com®. 

That wedge is largely driven by assessment limits, which cap how quickly a home’s taxable value can rise while the owner remains in place. The protection is meant to shield homeowners from being taxed on the full run-up in their home’s market value. However, when the home sells, the tax basis resets—leaving the next buyer with a much larger bill.

“Effectively, the longstanding homeowners end up paying heavily discounted property taxes, meaning they enjoy all of the capital gains benefits of rising property values without bearing the costs of owning more valuable real estate,” Krimmel says.

Where new buyers carry the highest relative property tax burden

While the impact is especially acute in 11 cities, the analysis found that new homeowners faced property tax bills at least 25% higher than comparable existing homeowners in 23 markets.

Across the 31 cities with parcel-specific assessment limits analyzed, the average ratio was 1.61—meaning new buyers pay 61% more in property taxes on average. In dollar terms, that amounts to just over $2,600 more per year for a new homeowner.

The largest divide is in Miami, where a newly purchased median-valued home comes with an estimated annual property tax bill of $10,024. That’s more than three times higher than the bill for a comparable home owned for the city’s average duration, which carries an estimated bill of $3,166—a difference of nearly $7,000 a year.

The difference is perhaps most visible in the effective tax rate—which shows the annual tax bill as a percentage of the home’s market value, making it easier to compare owners with similarly valued homes.

A new buyer in Miami pays an effective property tax rate of roughly 1.676% on a median-priced home, according to the study. But an owner of the same median-priced home who has been in place for the city’s average ownership duration of 13 years would pay an effective rate of just 0.529%.

That sizable difference is already showing up on the ground, according to Mick Duchon, a Miami-based real estate agent with The Corcoran Group.

“It absolutely tracks with what we’re seeing in South Florida,” he says. “The gap between a seller’s tax bill and what a new buyer will pay has become one of the most important and often most misunderstood parts of the deal.”

Duchon says he sees it most in neighborhoods where homeowners have stayed the longest—allowing them to benefit from years of capped increases.

“A seller might be paying taxes based on an assessed value from a decade ago, while a new buyer is effectively stepping into today’s market value,” he adds. “That reset can mean a dramatic jump, and in some cases, it meaningfully changes the true cost of ownership.”

And the effect is not limited to Miami, or even Florida for that matter.

California—where Proposition 13 limits annual assessment increases to just 2% unless a home is sold—accounts for five of the 11 cities where new buyers face property tax rates at least twice as high as average-tenure owners, including Los Angeles, San Diego, Long Beach, Oakland, and San Jose.

In San Jose, the dollar amount gap is even larger than in Miami. A newly purchased median-valued home carries an estimated tax bill of $16,119, compared with $7,941 for a comparable average-tenure home—a difference of $8,178 a year.

How different tax burdens are hitting the market

The tax gap is starting to change behavior on both sides of the transaction.

For buyers, the higher tax burden is stacked on top of other headwinds already making it hard to break into the market.

“For a buyer already stretching to make the numbers work at ~6% mortgage rates, an extra $400 to $500 a month in taxes they didn’t fully anticipate can be the difference between qualifying for the loan and getting priced out entirely,” explains Colton Pace, CEO and founder of Ownwell, a company that helps homeowners lower their homeownership costs.

That’s pushing some agents to treat projected taxes as an upfront affordability issue rather than a late-stage detail.

Pablo Alfaro, a Florida-based real estate agent with Compass, says he’s working with buyers in Miami to understand projected tax bills before submitting an offer.

“Buyers often look at the current tax bill as a baseline, and that can be misleading,” he explains. “We are now addressing it much earlier in the process. In many cases, before an offer is submitted, we walk buyers through a realistic projection based on the purchase price so they can fully understand their future carrying costs.”

Those high carrying costs may also be starting to tip the scales of pricing. A postsale tax reset can function much like a hidden rate buy-up: It doesn’t change the buyer’s mortgage rate, but in the most expensive markets, it can raise the monthly cost of ownership by hundreds of dollars.

But Krimmel says that steep competition may be muting these effects.

“Whether higher postsale tax burdens are effectively paid by the buyer or the seller depends on local supply and demand dynamics,” he explains. “In extremely desirable places to live—like most cities on the list—if inventories are low and sellers are in control, homes can still fetch high prices despite their larger property tax burden.”

Pace says that when the higher tax burden does get factored in, it often shows up as a hit to the seller—but that correction is uneven because many buyers don’t realize the size of the reset until they are already deep into the process.

“It’s usually the seller who absorbs it; the tax penalty effectively discounts the property’s value relative to what it would sell for in a state without assessment resets,” Pace says. “But that kind of correction happens slowly, not all at once.”

The larger distortion may happen before a home ever hits the market. For longtime owners, a low tax basis can become part of the value of staying put. Selling may mean giving up years of capped assessment growth and buying back into the market with a higher taxable value.

Krimmel says this is the more important market consequence of assessment limits.

“In addition to setting up an, arguably, inequitable system, assessment limits also have a distortionary effect on local housing markets,” he says. “Namely, they create an incentive for incumbent homeowners to stay put and never sell—a property tax lock-in effect.”

That lock-in effect can be especially strong for owners who might otherwise downsize, relocate, or trade into another home nearby. Even a smaller home can come with a higher tax bill if the new purchase resets closer to today’s market value.

Duchon says he sees that dynamic actively shaping behavior in Miami.

“Longtime homeowners are very aware that if they sell, they’re not just buying a new home—they’re resetting their entire tax basis,” he says. “For many, that creates a ‘stay put’ mentality, where the financial incentive to hold on to a favorable tax position outweighs the lifestyle motivation to move.”

But the effect is not automatic in every state with assessment limits.

The Lincoln analysis notes that Texas’ 10% assessment cap had a negligible impact in 2025, because market values had cooled enough for assessed values to catch up after the 2020 to 2022 price spike.

That suggests the biggest distortions emerge when three forces compound: homeowners stay put the longest, market values rise the fastest, and taxable values are capped aggressively below real market gains.

And it’s these markets where the burden spreads beyond the individual buyer.

A higher reassessed tax bill can reduce purchasing power on the way in and a protected tax basis can reduce listings on the way out. In places already short on inventory, both forces make the same problem harder to solve: fewer homes moving, fewer buyers able to stretch, and a widening divide between those who got in earlier and those trying to buy now.

If you’re thinking about buying a home or refinancing, paying attention to mortgage rates is key. For May 1st, 2026, the average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage is hovering around 6.21%. This is a bit higher than we saw a few weeks ago, and it’s a good reminder that the housing market is always influenced by bigger world events.

Today’s Mortgage Rates, May 1: Rates Rise, Fed Pause and Geopolitical Currents Sway Homebuyers

A Quick Look at Today’s Numbers

It’s always helpful to see where things stand, so let’s break down the averages released by Zillow’s lender marketplace today:

Loan Type	Current Average Rate (May 1, 2026)
30-Year Fixed	6.21%
20-Year Fixed	6.14%
15-Year Fixed	5.63%
5/1 ARM	6.14%
7/1 ARM	6.14%
30-Year VA	5.64%
15-Year VA	5.22%
5/1 VA	5.22%

What I notice right away is that brief dip we saw at the end of April has reversed. It feels like the market took a deep breath and then reacted.

What’s Driving These Numbers? Recent Trends and The “Going Direction”

As I’ve seen over the years, even small shifts in mortgage rates can make a big difference in monthly payments. The move we’re seeing into May is largely tied to a few significant factors.

• Inflation’s Stubborn Streak: We’re seeing stronger-than-expected inflation data, which naturally pushes mortgage rates higher. When inflation is a concern, lenders want to ensure their returns keep pace, and that often means adjusting interest rates upward. This also correlates with rising 10-year Treasury yields. These Treasury yields are a benchmark for mortgage rates, so when they climb, mortgage rates tend to follow suit.
• The Shadow of Global Events: Right now, the escalating geopolitical conflict between the U.S. and Iran is unfortunately a major talking point. When global tensions rise, oil prices often spike. Higher oil prices contribute to inflation fears, which in turn drive bond yields upward. It’s a complex chain reaction, but it’s a very real influence on why mortgage rates are staying elevated.
• The Fed’s Steady Hand (For Now): The Federal Reserve recently decided to keep the federal funds rate steady, sitting between 3.50% and 3.75%. This “higher-for-longer” stance from the Fed is important. It signals that they aren’t rushing to cut rates any time soon. For borrowers, this means we shouldn’t expect significantly lower mortgage rates in the immediate future.

Looking Ahead: Forecast for the Rest of 2026

Forecasting is always a bit of an art and a science, but based on insights from major organizations like the Mortgage Bankers Association and Fannie Mae, the general expectation is for rates to stay within a relatively tight range for the rest of the year.

• A Stable, If Elevated, Range: Most analysts are predicting that mortgage rates will likely stay between 5.90% and 6.40% through the end of 2026. It’s not a dramatic drop, but it suggests a period of relative stability after the recent ups and downs.
• Potential for Small Dips: Some economists are cautiously optimistic that we could see rates dip closer to 5.50% by mid-2026. This would depend heavily on whether Treasury yields begin to ease. However, there are underlying economic pressures that could push rates back up in the latter half of the year, so it’s a delicate balance.
• A Quieter Market: With financing costs still pretty high, I anticipate that home-buying activity will remain somewhat subdued. We are seeing some improvement in home inventory, which is good news for buyers, but the cost of borrowing is still a significant consideration for many.

What Does This Mean for You?

These current rates and future projections have real implications depending on your situation.

• For Homebuyers: Rates above 6% certainly make affordability a challenge. However, with more homes becoming available, buyers have a bit more negotiating power. You might be able to get the seller to agree to some concessions, like closing cost assistance, which can help offset the higher interest rate.
• For Refinancers: If your current mortgage rate is significantly higher than 7%, there’s a good chance you could still benefit from refinancing. The key is to watch for those opportune moments when rates dip, even slightly. Timing is crucial in a volatile market.
• The Overall Market Outlook: Given the ongoing geopolitical concerns and persistent inflation, I believe we’re likely to see mortgage rates settle into a pattern of modest fluctuations within that low-to-mid 6% range. This means there will be windows of opportunity, but they might not be large or last very long. It’s important to be prepared and act when you see a good chance.

The Bottom Line:

As we turn the calendar page to May 1st, 2026, the average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage stands at 6.21%. This marks an end to a brief period of declining rates and signals a return to elevated levels, influenced by renewed inflation concerns and global instability. With the Federal Reserve holding its stance and forecasts suggesting rates will remain “sticky” rather than plunging, borrowers should prepare for a year of moderate rate changes rather than a dramatic shift downward. Staying informed and understanding the forces at play are your best tools right now.